🌍 Obama and Bush Unite to Condemn Trump’s Shutdown of USAID: “A Colossal Mistake”
In a rare moment of bipartisan unity, former Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush have spoken out forcefully against Donald Trump’s decision to dismantle USAID, the U.S. Agency for International Development—a move experts warn could result in over 14 million avoidable deaths worldwide.
The abrupt shutdown of one of the most critical humanitarian and global health organizations in American history has sparked outrage across party lines, as consequences begin to unfold both at home and abroad.
❌ “A Travesty—and a Tragedy,” Obama Says in Farewell Message
Speaking in a private farewell message to USAID workers, Obama didn’t mince words.
“Gutting USAID is a travesty, and it’s a tragedy,” Obama said, according to The Associated Press. “Because it’s some of the most important work happening anywhere in the world.”
Obama praised the agency’s decades of humanitarian work, assuring its staff their efforts had left a lasting legacy.
“Sooner or later, leaders on both sides of the aisle will realize how much you are needed. Your work has mattered—and will matter—for generations to come.”
🇺🇸 Bush Defends Life-Saving Global Health Programs
Former President George W. Bush, who founded PEPFAR (the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief), also released a farewell statement defending USAID’s mission—and warning against abandoning America’s global health leadership.
“Is it in our national interest that 25 million people who would have died now live? I think it is—and so do you,” Bush said.
“You’ve showed the great strength of America through your work – and that is your good heart,” he added.
It’s a striking rebuke from a Republican president who rarely weighs in on domestic political controversy—but has long advocated for international aid as a moral and strategic necessity.
⚠️ Trump’s Cuts Leave a Humanitarian Vacuum
Under Trump’s executive order, USAID’s budget and contracts were slashed by 90%, effectively dismantling its infrastructure. At its peak, USAID employed over 10,000 people working in over 100 countries. Today, fewer than 300 remain, and many ongoing aid efforts have already halted.
What filled the vacuum? A new entity called “America First,” housed under Marco Rubio’s State Department, focused primarily on immigration control, border surveillance, and economic nationalization—leaving public health, disaster response, and famine relief on the cutting-room floor.
This new organization’s priorities abandon multilateralism and global development partnerships in favor of a nationalist agenda that critics argue is both short-sighted and cruel.
📊 The Lancet: 14 Million Lives at Risk
A peer-reviewed study published in The Lancet provides a harrowing forecast: If the dismantling of USAID continues, up to 14 million people—mostly in low- and middle-income countries—could die preventable deaths within five years.
“Beyond causing millions of avoidable deaths—particularly among the most vulnerable—these cuts risk reversing decades of progress in health and socioeconomic development,” the study concluded.
Experts say that cutting off USAID funding could:
Halt access to HIV/AIDS medication
Disrupt maternal and child health programs
Undermine clean water and sanitation infrastructure
Weaken disaster response systems
Erase decades of progress in eradicating global poverty and disease
💰 Musk, DOGE, and the Billionaire Distraction
The final dismantling of USAID coincided with the rise of Elon Musk’s DOGE Initiative, an opaque private-sector crypto project that gained influence during Trump’s second term. As USAID budgets were decimated, Musk’s pet projects—many branded as “alternatives to foreign aid”—received federal promotion despite lacking transparency or measurable impact.
Instead of strengthening America’s humanitarian leadership, the administration outsourced credibility to billionaires while sidelining trained development experts.
🔁 A Legacy of Ashes?
Both Obama and Bush agree: USAID’s closure is not just a policy misstep—it’s a moral failure. For decades, the agency served as one of the most powerful tools of American diplomacy, building goodwill, fighting disease, and promoting stability in some of the world’s most vulnerable regions.
Now, that infrastructure is gone.
And while some may see foreign aid as expendable, history will remember what came next: abandoned hospitals, shuttered vaccine programs, and preventable suffering—on a global scale.
📢 Final Thoughts: This Isn’t Partisan—It’s a Humanitarian Crisis
This moment goes far beyond left vs. right. When two former presidents—one Democrat, one Republican—publicly unite to condemn a policy, it should be a wake-up call. Cutting off global health and humanitarian aid isn’t just short-sighted—it’s dangerous.
It may take years to rebuild what’s been lost. In the meantime, the world will suffer—and so will America’s moral standing.
Comments
Post a Comment